02-14-2024, 05:17 PM
Apparently, London has as many people as Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Detroit, Dallas, Seattle, and San Francisco combined:
![[Image: HygGAoG.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/HygGAoG.jpeg)
Sadly, the truth is much more mundane: this map is completely misleading. It uses the city proper definitions of the American cities: all seven of them have vast urban areas that aren't taken into account. For example, Chicago has 2,746,388 people living within its city limits - but when you add in the suburbs, it has a total urban-area population of 8,671,746 (almost as many as the entirety of Greater London).
By contrast, London annexed most of its suburbs in 1965 - so its 'city proper' population (8,799,800) isn't much different from its 'urban area' population (9,787,426).
![[Image: HygGAoG.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/HygGAoG.jpeg)
Sadly, the truth is much more mundane: this map is completely misleading. It uses the city proper definitions of the American cities: all seven of them have vast urban areas that aren't taken into account. For example, Chicago has 2,746,388 people living within its city limits - but when you add in the suburbs, it has a total urban-area population of 8,671,746 (almost as many as the entirety of Greater London).
By contrast, London annexed most of its suburbs in 1965 - so its 'city proper' population (8,799,800) isn't much different from its 'urban area' population (9,787,426).
![[Image: CJTrain.gif]](https://caludin.com/mystuff/requests/CJTrain.gif)
Board Information and Policies
Affiliation | Coffee Credits | Ranks and Awards | Name Changes
Account Deletion | BBCode Reference
Moonface (in 'Woman runs 49 red lights in ex's car')' Wrote: If only she had ran another 20 lights.
(Thanks to Nilla for the avatar, and Megan for the sig!)