The Basement Tapes are perhaps the most sought-after piece of evidence in the history of true crime (or, at least, of school shootings). They are Eric and Dylan's final will and manifesto, recorded both in the weeks leading to and in the morning of their attack on Columbine High School.
The tapes' very existence was initially denied, then begrudgingly confirmed after they were entered as evidence on the trial of the gun suppliers and later quoted by a Time Magazine article, causing an uproar among the relatives of the victims.
While officially destroyed, it is really very hard to imagine that such an important piece of evidence would be just erased without having any copies available, and people have been dying to see them ever-since they were first discovered.
NOW... law-enforcement say that they won't ever show these tapes because they might encourage copycats, but the general consensus among the public is that that boat has long sailed, tapes or not. And I fully agree, believing that there's more harm done by keeping them under wraps, considering that testimony among those few who were able to see them states that both shooters were drowning on their own forced bravado and that they were acting way too hard to be cool. If that's true, then I think that keeping the tapes away from the public might help idolizing them in a way that showing them might not. If they really looked that foolish while recording their diatribe, then that could defuse the situation once and for all by forcing those who look up to them to view them as try-hards and losers.
But, of course, this is playing with fire regardless of the outcome... maybe releasing these tapes would encourage even more copycats, which is certainly a possibility, and I can at least see why the cops would be hesitant to release them if that's the case. There's also the fact that at least a couple of the tapes include instructions on bomb-making and hiding places for arsenals, which should never reach the public. It's a complicated case, is what I'm saying.
Thoughts?
The tapes' very existence was initially denied, then begrudgingly confirmed after they were entered as evidence on the trial of the gun suppliers and later quoted by a Time Magazine article, causing an uproar among the relatives of the victims.
While officially destroyed, it is really very hard to imagine that such an important piece of evidence would be just erased without having any copies available, and people have been dying to see them ever-since they were first discovered.
NOW... law-enforcement say that they won't ever show these tapes because they might encourage copycats, but the general consensus among the public is that that boat has long sailed, tapes or not. And I fully agree, believing that there's more harm done by keeping them under wraps, considering that testimony among those few who were able to see them states that both shooters were drowning on their own forced bravado and that they were acting way too hard to be cool. If that's true, then I think that keeping the tapes away from the public might help idolizing them in a way that showing them might not. If they really looked that foolish while recording their diatribe, then that could defuse the situation once and for all by forcing those who look up to them to view them as try-hards and losers.
But, of course, this is playing with fire regardless of the outcome... maybe releasing these tapes would encourage even more copycats, which is certainly a possibility, and I can at least see why the cops would be hesitant to release them if that's the case. There's also the fact that at least a couple of the tapes include instructions on bomb-making and hiding places for arsenals, which should never reach the public. It's a complicated case, is what I'm saying.
Thoughts?




![[Image: F1s-VRh7-X0-AAXZc5.webp]](https://i.postimg.cc/3NGhJzhR/F1s-VRh7-X0-AAXZc5.webp)