05-29-2024, 10:46 PM
https://www.psypost.org/young-children-a...er-humans/
A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior sheds light on how young children decide who to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. Researchers found that children aged three to six are more likely to trust robots over humans when both sources of information are established as reliable.
The motivation behind the study was to understand how children decide whom to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. With the increasing presence of robots and other technological devices in children’s lives, it is important to explore how these interactions influence their learning and development.
For their study, the researchers recruited 118 children through various channels, including mailing lists, social media, and the website Children Helping Science. After excluding data from seven children who failed preliminary checks, 111 participants were included in the final analysis.
This does sound rather concerning to me... obviously, neither robots nor humans are 100% reliable, but I would've thought robots would be easier to manipulate than humans!
Perhaps it's because robots are, in some ways, more "child-like" than adult humans, and therefore come across as more relatable? I don't know
.
A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior sheds light on how young children decide who to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. Researchers found that children aged three to six are more likely to trust robots over humans when both sources of information are established as reliable.
The motivation behind the study was to understand how children decide whom to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. With the increasing presence of robots and other technological devices in children’s lives, it is important to explore how these interactions influence their learning and development.
For their study, the researchers recruited 118 children through various channels, including mailing lists, social media, and the website Children Helping Science. After excluding data from seven children who failed preliminary checks, 111 participants were included in the final analysis.
This does sound rather concerning to me... obviously, neither robots nor humans are 100% reliable, but I would've thought robots would be easier to manipulate than humans!
Perhaps it's because robots are, in some ways, more "child-like" than adult humans, and therefore come across as more relatable? I don't know

![[Image: CJTrain.gif]](https://caludin.com/mystuff/requests/CJTrain.gif)
Board Information and Policies
Affiliation | Coffee Credits | Ranks and Awards | Name Changes
Account Deletion | BBCode Reference
Moonface (in 'Woman runs 49 red lights in ex's car')' Wrote: If only she had ran another 20 lights.
(Thanks to Nilla for the avatar, and Megan for the sig!)