11-01-2022, 10:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2022, 10:21 AM by
Pyrite.)
Yes, it's curious to see how these images change depending on what light you are collecting. In the case of the 'ghostly' one above, this was mid-IR light as opposed to near-IR, which was the first image.
In any case, these images are breathtakingly beautiful! Makes you realise just how vast the universe is.
(09-15-2022, 08:52 PM)Kyng Wrote: Apparently, astronomers have a weird problem: the James Webb Space Telescope is too good
!
Once they receive data from the telescope, they need to use theoretical models to interpret it. And right now, those models aren't accurate enough - which means we could be misinterpreting the telescope's data:
https://www.independent.co.uk/space/nasa...67124.html
A bit annoying, but certainly a 'better' problem than anything being wrong with the telescope itself!!!
Yeah...from my experience in academia this isn't surprising. You make a big leap forward in terms of your data quality, and suddenly you realise you now need better models and hypotheses to interpret the data. Can tell you that there's lots of people working to improve the theory side of things too though, so I wouldn't worry!
*many thanks to Oscar for the red panda avatar*
Quote:"Anybody who thinks this is a good idea deserves to be prodded repeatedly with my selfie stick" - CJ's impression of me